Chapter 4: Environmental Balance
Solved textbook questions with step-by-step explanations.
ScienceSpark
Grade 5 Q&A: Chapter 4: Environmental Balance
Concept Questions
Q1: What is biodiversity?
Answer: Biodiversity is the variety of living things that belong to a particular area. It refers to the different types of plants, animals, and microorganisms found in a specific environment.
Q2: What is meant by the term "environment"?
Answer: The environment refers to the surroundings and conditions in those surroundings which affect the life of organisms. It includes many components such as sunlight, air, water, soil, plants, and animals.
Q3: What are the main components of the environment?
Answer: The main components of the environment include sunlight, air, water, soil, plants, and animals. These components interact with each other to create the conditions necessary for life.
Q4: How are living and non-living things related in an environment?
Answer: Living and non-living things are dependent on each other. There is a lot of give and take or interaction between them. For example, plants need sunlight, water, and soil (non-living things) to grow, while animals need plants and water to survive.
Q5: What does Environmental Science study?
Answer: Environmental Science studies the interactions between living and non-living things in the environment. It examines how these components affect each other and how they maintain balance in nature.
Q6: What is a food chain?
Answer: A food chain is a sequence that shows who eats whom in nature. It represents the transfer of energy from one organism to another, starting with plants (producers) that make their own food using sunlight, followed by herbivores that eat plants, and then carnivores that eat herbivores.
Q7: What is a food web?
Answer: A food web is a network of interconnected food chains that shows the complex feeding relationships in an ecosystem. It illustrates how many animals eat more than one type of food and how many plants and animals serve as food for multiple species.
Q8: What are producers in a food chain?
Answer: Producers are organisms, typically green plants, that can make their own food through photosynthesis using sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide. They form the first level of every food chain and are the primary source of energy for all other organisms in an ecosystem.
Q9: What are consumers in a food chain?
Answer: Consumers are organisms that cannot make their own food and must eat other organisms to obtain energy. They include herbivores (primary consumers) that eat plants, carnivores (secondary consumers) that eat herbivores, and omnivores that eat both plants and animals.
Q10: What are decomposers and what role do they play in an ecosystem?
Answer: Decomposers are organisms like bacteria and fungi that break down dead plants and animals into simpler substances. They play a crucial role in recycling nutrients back into the soil, which can then be used by plants. This completes the nutrient cycle in an ecosystem and helps maintain environmental balance.
Application-Based Questions
Q11: If you visit a forest and a desert, which place would likely show greater biodiversity? Why?
Answer: A forest would likely show greater biodiversity than a desert because forests typically have more abundant water, moderate temperatures, and varied habitats that can support many different types of plants and animals. Deserts have harsh conditions with limited water and extreme temperatures, which fewer species have adapted to survive in.
Q12: How would you record your observations if you were studying biodiversity in your school garden?
Answer: To record observations in a school garden, I would make a list of all living things I see, describing their shape, color, size, and behavior. I would note where each organism was found, what it was doing, and any interactions with other organisms. I might draw pictures or take photographs, count the number of different species, and observe at different times of day and in different weather conditions to get a complete picture.
Q13: What would happen to a food web if all the grass in a grassland ecosystem suddenly disappeared?
Answer: If all the grass in a grassland ecosystem suddenly disappeared, it would cause a cascade of effects throughout the food web. Herbivores like deer, rabbits, and grasshoppers that depend directly on grass would lose their primary food source and either starve or be forced to migrate. This would then affect the carnivores that feed on these herbivores, such as tigers, wolves, and birds of prey, causing their populations to decline as well. The entire food web would be disrupted, potentially leading to the collapse of the ecosystem if alternative food sources weren't available. Additionally, the absence of grass would affect soil stability, potentially leading to erosion and further habitat degradation.
Q14: How does energy flow through a food chain?
Answer: Energy flows through a food chain in one direction, from the sun to producers to consumers. The sun provides energy that plants capture through photosynthesis to produce food. When herbivores eat plants, they obtain some of this energy. When carnivores eat herbivores, they obtain a portion of that energy. At each step, a significant amount of energy (about 90%) is lost as heat through metabolic processes, which is why food chains typically have only 4-5 links. This one-way flow of energy, with losses at each transfer, is represented by arrows in food chain diagrams.
Q15: Why do scientists need to make observations in different conditions such as day and night or different seasons?
Answer: Scientists need to make observations in different conditions because many living things are active at specific times (some animals are nocturnal and only come out at night) or during certain seasons (some plants flower only in specific seasons). Making observations under various conditions ensures a more complete understanding of biodiversity.
Q16: How might a change in water quality affect the biodiversity of a lake?
Answer: A change in water quality, such as increased pollution or changes in temperature, acidity, or oxygen levels, would affect the biodiversity of a lake by making the environment unsuitable for certain species. Sensitive organisms like certain fish, amphibians, and aquatic plants might die off, while pollution-tolerant species might increase. This would disrupt food chains and the overall ecosystem balance. Reduced biodiversity could lead to algal blooms, fish kills, and a general decline in the health and functionality of the lake ecosystem.
Q17: What would happen to soil quality if all decomposers (like certain bacteria and fungi) disappeared from an ecosystem?
Answer: If all decomposers disappeared from an ecosystem, dead plants and animals would not break down properly. This would lead to an accumulation of dead organic matter on the soil surface. Nutrients locked in this organic matter would not be released back into the soil, leading to nutrient depletion. Soil structure would deteriorate, affecting water retention and aeration. Plants would struggle to grow due to lack of nutrients, which would then affect all other organisms in the food web. The nutrient cycle would be broken, severely disrupting the environmental balance.
Q18: Why are arrows used in food chain diagrams, and what do they represent?
Answer: Arrows are used in food chain diagrams to show the direction of energy flow from one organism to another. The arrow points from the organism being eaten to the organism doing the eating. For example, in a food chain showing "grass → deer → tiger," the arrows indicate that energy stored in grass is transferred to the deer when it eats the grass, and then energy from the deer is transferred to the tiger when it eats the deer. The arrows represent not just "who eats whom" but also the one-way transfer of energy through the ecosystem.
Q19: How would removing a top predator like a tiger affect the food web in a forest ecosystem?
Answer: Removing a top predator like a tiger from a forest ecosystem would likely cause a trophic cascade of effects throughout the food web. Without tigers, the population of herbivores like deer would increase due to reduced predation. The larger herbivore population would consume more vegetation, potentially leading to overgrazing and reduction in plant diversity. This could affect other species that depend on those plants for food or habitat. The increased competition among herbivores might lead to some species outcompeting others. Additionally, smaller predators might increase in number without competition from tigers, affecting their prey populations. This demonstrates how top predators help maintain balance in ecosystems, and their removal can disrupt the entire food web structure.
Q20: How do seasonal changes affect biodiversity in a particular area?
Answer: Seasonal changes affect biodiversity by influencing the life cycles and behaviors of various organisms. In spring, many plants flower and animals reproduce. Summer provides abundant resources for growth. Fall triggers seed dispersal, migration, and preparation for winter. Winter causes dormancy in many plants and hibernation or migration in animals. Different species may be active or visible during different seasons, and the composition of the active community changes throughout the year. These seasonal patterns are important for maintaining biodiversity and environmental balance.
Higher-Order Thinking Questions
Q21: "Environmental balance is like a complex web where pulling one thread can affect the entire structure." Discuss this statement with examples of how changes to one component of an ecosystem can have far-reaching effects.
Answer: This statement accurately captures the interconnected nature of ecosystems. When one component changes, it can trigger a cascade of effects throughout the system. For example, if a top predator like wolves is removed from a forest, deer populations might explode without this natural control. The increased deer population would then overgraze vegetation, reducing plant diversity and eliminating habitat for birds and small mammals. With fewer plants, soil erosion might increase, affecting water quality in nearby streams and harming aquatic life. The reduced vegetation could also impact the local climate by altering carbon storage, evapotranspiration, and shade patterns. Another example is the introduction of non-native species like water hyacinth into a lake. This fast-growing plant can cover water surfaces, blocking sunlight from reaching underwater plants and depleting oxygen levels as it decomposes. This affects fish and other aquatic organisms, which in turn impacts birds and mammals that feed on them. Fishing communities dependent on the lake might suffer economic hardship, leading to social and economic ripple effects. These examples demonstrate that environmental balance depends on complex relationships between all components, and disruptions can propagate through the system in sometimes unexpected ways, highlighting the importance of considering the entire ecosystem in conservation and management decisions.
Q22: Compare and contrast food chains and food webs. Why are food webs considered more realistic representations of energy flow in ecosystems?
Answer: Food chains and food webs both represent feeding relationships in ecosystems, but they differ in complexity and realism. Food chains are linear sequences showing a single pathway of energy transfer from producers through various consumers. They're simple, easy to understand, and clearly show trophic levels. However, they present an oversimplified view of nature by suggesting that organisms have only one food source and serve as food for only one predator. Food webs, on the other hand, are interconnected networks of multiple food chains. They show how species interact with multiple other species, with many organisms eating various foods and being eaten by multiple predators. Food webs illustrate alternative pathways of energy flow and complex interdependencies. Food webs are considered more realistic representations of energy flow in ecosystems for several reasons: 1. Dietary diversity: Most animals consume multiple food types rather than relying on a single source, which food webs accurately depict. 2. Redundancy and resilience: Food webs show how ecosystems can maintain function even if some species decline, as alternative energy pathways exist. 3. Competition and resource sharing: Food webs illustrate how multiple species may compete for the same resources. 4. Indirect effects: Food webs help visualize how changes affecting one species can indirectly impact others that aren't directly connected in a simple food chain. 5. Omnivory representation: Many animals are omnivores, eating both plants and animals, which is difficult to represent in a linear food chain but natural in a food web structure. 6. Adaptability: Food webs can show how feeding relationships might shift seasonally or as resource availability changes. While food chains are valuable educational tools for understanding basic energy flow concepts, food webs provide the more comprehensive and accurate picture needed for understanding ecosystem dynamics and predicting responses to environmental changes.
Q23: How does the concept of biodiversity relate to environmental balance, and why is maintaining biodiversity important for the health of ecosystems?
Answer: Biodiversity and environmental balance are deeply interconnected concepts. Biodiversity refers to the variety of living organisms in an ecosystem, while environmental balance refers to the stable state where all components of an ecosystem interact harmoniously. Biodiversity contributes to environmental balance by creating redundancy (multiple species performing similar ecological functions), which provides resilience against disturbances. When an ecosystem has high biodiversity, it can better maintain its essential processes even if some species are affected by disease, climate change, or other stressors. Maintaining biodiversity is crucial for ecosystem health for several reasons: 1. Ecosystem services: Different species contribute to vital processes like pollination, seed dispersal, pest control, and decomposition. Greater biodiversity ensures these services continue even if some species decline. 2. Nutrient cycling: Various organisms play specific roles in breaking down organic matter and recycling nutrients, maintaining soil fertility and water quality. 3. Food web stability: Complex food webs with many species create multiple pathways for energy flow, making the ecosystem more stable when populations fluctuate. 4. Adaptation potential: Genetic diversity within and between species provides the raw material for adaptation to environmental changes, including climate change. 5. Disease and pest resistance: Diverse ecosystems are less vulnerable to catastrophic disease outbreaks or pest invasions that might devastate monocultures. 6. Productivity: Complementary resource use by different species often leads to greater overall ecosystem productivity. When biodiversity declines, these functions can be compromised, leading to ecosystem degradation, reduced productivity, increased vulnerability to invasive species, and diminished ability to recover from disturbances—ultimately disrupting environmental balance. Therefore, conservation of biodiversity is not just about preserving species for their intrinsic value but is essential for maintaining functional, resilient ecosystems that can continue to support all life, including humans.
Q24: "Humans are both part of the environment and agents that modify it." Evaluate this statement and discuss the ethical responsibilities humans have in maintaining environmental balance.
Answer: This statement captures a fundamental truth about humanity's dual role in the environment. As biological organisms, humans are integral parts of ecosystems—we depend on air, water, food, and other resources just like any other species. We participate in food webs, nutrient cycles, and other ecological processes. However, unlike most species, humans have developed unprecedented capabilities to modify environments through technology, agriculture, urbanization, resource extraction, and other activities that can dramatically alter landscapes and ecological processes at local and global scales. This unique position creates ethical responsibilities for maintaining environmental balance: 1. Stewardship responsibility: Our capacity to understand environmental systems and predict the consequences of our actions creates an obligation to use this knowledge responsibly. We can foresee harm in ways other species cannot, giving us a special duty of care. 2. Intergenerational justice: Current generations have a responsibility to preserve environmental quality and biodiversity for future generations, who have no voice in today's decisions but will inherit the consequences. 3. Ecological justice: All species have intrinsic value and a right to exist independent of their usefulness to humans. Our modifications should not unnecessarily threaten other species' existence. 4. Proportionality: Our environmental impact should be proportionate to our legitimate needs, avoiding excessive consumption and waste that disrupts natural systems unnecessarily. 5. Restoration: Where human activities have damaged ecosystems, we have a responsibility to support recovery through active restoration efforts. 6. Knowledge-seeking: We should continue to study environmental systems to better understand the consequences of our actions and improve our stewardship. 7. Global cooperation: Environmental challenges cross political boundaries, requiring collaborative solutions at international scales. These responsibilities require balancing human development needs with environmental protection through sustainable practices, conservation efforts, pollution control, and climate action. The ethical imperative is not to eliminate human influence—which is impossible—but to ensure our modifications maintain the fundamental ecological processes that support all life, including our own. This represents a shift from seeing humans as separate from nature to recognizing our embeddedness in and dependence on healthy ecosystems.
Q25: Explain why energy decreases at each level of a food chain. How does this energy loss affect the structure of ecosystems?
Answer: Energy decreases at each level of a food chain due to the laws of thermodynamics, specifically the Second Law, which states that energy transfer is never 100% efficient. When energy moves from one trophic level to the next, approximately 90% is lost through several mechanisms: 1. Metabolic processes: A significant portion of the energy organisms consume is used for their own life processes—respiration, movement, growth, reproduction, and maintaining body temperature. 2. Heat loss: Much of the energy used in metabolic processes is converted to heat, which dissipates into the environment and cannot be used by the next trophic level. 3. Incomplete consumption: Predators often don't consume entire prey (leaving bones, fur, etc.), and herbivores don't eat all parts of plants. 4. Incomplete digestion: Not all consumed biomass is digestible; some passes through as waste. 5. Excretion: Some energy-containing compounds are excreted as waste products. This energy loss profoundly affects ecosystem structure in several ways: 1. Pyramid of numbers: Each trophic level supports fewer individuals than the level below it, creating a numerical pyramid. For example, many plants support fewer herbivores, which support even fewer carnivores. 2. Limited food chain length: The significant energy loss at each transfer typically limits food chains to 4-5 links. Beyond this, insufficient energy remains to support viable populations of higher-level predators. 3. Biomass distribution: The total biomass (weight of living organisms) decreases at higher trophic levels, forming a pyramid of biomass in most ecosystems. 4. Predator-prey ratios: Top predators require large territories and prey populations to obtain sufficient energy, affecting population densities and distributions. 5. Ecosystem productivity requirements: Ecosystems with top predators require highly productive lower trophic levels to support the entire food chain. 6. Energy efficiency adaptations: Many organisms have evolved specialized adaptations to maximize energy extraction from their food sources. Understanding this energy loss explains why apex predators are rare and vulnerable to ecosystem disturbances, why productive ecosystems can support more complex food webs, and why conservation efforts often focus on preserving large territories for top predators. It also explains why human consumption of animal products is less energy-efficient than plant consumption, as each trophic level transfer results in substantial energy loss.
Exercise Questions
Q26: What signs might indicate the presence of animals even when the animals themselves are not visible?
Answer: Signs that might indicate the presence of animals even when they are not directly visible include partly eaten fruits or shells, fallen feathers, animal tracks or footprints, dung or droppings, nests, burrows or dens, cocoons, eggs, honeycombs, scratch marks on trees, hair or fur caught on plants, trails through vegetation, sounds or calls, and disturbed soil or vegetation.
Q27: Why do scientists need to make observations over a long period of time to be sure of the biodiversity of a place?
Answer: Scientists need to make observations over a long period of time to be sure of the biodiversity of a place because many factors affect which species are visible or active at any given time. Some species are seasonal, appearing only during certain times of year. Others may be nocturnal or only active at specific times of day. Population cycles might mean some species are abundant in some years but rare in others. Weather conditions can affect activity patterns. Some species might be naturally rare and require extensive observation to detect. Additionally, long-term studies allow scientists to observe changes in biodiversity over time, which is important for understanding ecosystem dynamics and the impacts of environmental changes.
Q28: Draw a food chain with at least four links. Explain what would happen if one of the organisms in your food chain disappeared.
Answer: A four-link food chain: Grass → Grasshopper → Frog → Snake → Hawk If the frog disappeared from this food chain, several effects would occur: 1. The grasshopper population would likely increase due to reduced predation, potentially leading to crop damage or defoliation of plants. 2. The snake population would decline due to loss of a primary food source, forcing them to rely more heavily on alternative prey or face starvation. 3. With fewer snakes, hawk populations might decrease or be forced to shift their hunting to other prey species. 4. The entire balance of the ecosystem would be disrupted, potentially leading to cascading effects through other interconnected food chains. 5. Over time, other predators might increase their consumption of grasshoppers, or snakes might adapt to different prey, establishing a new balance, but the ecosystem would be altered. This demonstrates how each link in a food chain is important for maintaining environmental balance, and the removal of any organism can have far-reaching consequences throughout the ecosystem.
Q29: Describe the mutual relationship between plants and soil as components of the environment.
Answer: Plants and soil have a complex mutual relationship where each benefits from and influences the other. Plants depend on soil for physical support, water, and essential nutrients. Their roots anchor them in the soil and absorb water and minerals necessary for growth. In return, plants contribute to soil development and health in several ways. When plants die and decompose, they add organic matter to the soil, improving its structure and fertility. Living plant roots release substances that feed beneficial soil microorganisms and help break down minerals. These roots also help prevent soil erosion by holding soil particles together. Plants shade the soil, regulating its temperature and moisture levels. Through transpiration, plants participate in the water cycle, affecting soil moisture. Some plants, like legumes, have symbiotic relationships with bacteria that fix nitrogen from the air into forms usable by plants, enriching the soil. The type and diversity of plants growing in an area influence soil development, while soil characteristics determine which plant communities can thrive there. This interdependence illustrates the give-and-take relationship between living and non-living components of the environment.
Q30: How do living and non-living things interact to maintain environmental balance?
Answer: Living and non-living things interact to maintain environmental balance through numerous interconnected processes and cycles. Plants use sunlight (non-living) to produce oxygen through photosynthesis, which animals breathe, while animals produce carbon dioxide that plants use. This gas exchange helps maintain atmospheric composition. Plants and animals depend on water (non-living) for survival, and their activities influence water quality and distribution through transpiration, consumption, and physical effects on water flow. The decomposition of dead organisms by bacteria and fungi returns nutrients to soil and water, making them available for new plant growth. Animals like earthworms and insects physically modify soil structure, improving aeration and water infiltration. Weather and climate (non-living factors) influence which organisms can survive in an area, while vegetation affects local climate conditions through shade, transpiration, and wind-breaking. Rocks weather into soil components, providing minerals for plants, while plant roots help break down rocks further. These interactions create feedback loops that tend toward stability—when one component changes, others respond in ways that often counteract extreme shifts, helping to maintain balance. However, this balance is dynamic rather than static, with natural fluctuations occurring within bounds that the system can accommodate. When changes exceed these bounds, such as through severe pollution or habitat destruction, environmental balance can be disrupted, leading to ecosystem degradation.
Q31: What is the difference between a herbivore, a carnivore, and an omnivore? Give one example of each.
Answer: Herbivores are animals that eat only plant material. They have specialized digestive systems to break down plant cellulose and often have flat teeth for grinding plant matter. Example: Deer, which feed on grass, leaves, and twigs. Carnivores are animals that eat only other animals. They typically have sharp teeth and claws for catching and tearing prey, and shorter digestive tracts specialized for processing meat. Example: Tiger, which hunts and eats other animals like deer and wild boar. Omnivores are animals that eat both plant and animal material. They have versatile digestive systems and varied teeth types that allow them to process both plant matter and meat. Example: Bears, which eat berries, nuts, and honey as well as fish and small mammals. These different feeding types play important roles in food chains and food webs, occupying different trophic levels and helping to maintain environmental balance through their feeding activities.
Q32: Explain how energy flows through an ecosystem from the sun to apex predators.
Answer: Energy flows through an ecosystem in a one-way direction, beginning with the sun. Solar energy is captured by producers (mainly green plants) through photosynthesis, where it's converted into chemical energy stored in organic compounds like glucose. Only about 1% of the available sunlight is actually converted to plant biomass. Primary consumers (herbivores) eat these plants, obtaining roughly 10% of the plants' stored energy. The remaining 90% is lost as heat through the plants' metabolic processes or remains in indigestible parts. Secondary consumers (carnivores) eat the herbivores, again capturing only about 10% of the available energy from their prey. Similarly, tertiary consumers (larger predators or apex predators) eat secondary consumers, with the same energy transfer efficiency. At each trophic level, energy is used for movement, growth, reproduction, and maintaining body temperature, with most being lost as heat through respiration and other metabolic processes. Some energy also remains unused in waste products or indigestible parts. This inefficient energy transfer explains why food chains rarely exceed 4-5 levels and why apex predators require large territories to obtain sufficient energy. The energy that entered the ecosystem as sunlight is ultimately dissipated as heat, requiring constant solar input to maintain the ecosystem's energy balance. Decomposers (bacteria and fungi) operate at all trophic levels, breaking down dead organisms and waste products, releasing nutrients back into the ecosystem but with the original solar energy ultimately dissipated as heat.
Q33: What is the importance of decomposers in maintaining environmental balance?
Answer: Decomposers play a crucial role in maintaining environmental balance through several important functions: 1. Nutrient recycling: Decomposers break down dead plants, animals, and waste materials into simpler inorganic substances that can be reused by plants. Without decomposers, nutrients would remain locked in dead organisms, eventually depleting the soil of essential elements needed for plant growth. 2. Waste removal: By consuming dead matter, decomposers clean the environment of carcasses, fallen leaves, and other organic debris that would otherwise accumulate. 3. Soil formation and improvement: The activities of decomposers contribute to soil formation by breaking down organic matter into humus, which improves soil structure, water retention, and fertility. 4. Completing food webs: Decomposers represent an essential component of food webs, ensuring that energy and nutrients from dead organisms are not lost but rather returned to the ecosystem. 5. Carbon cycling: Decomposers release carbon dioxide back into the atmosphere through their respiration, which is then used by plants for photosynthesis, completing the carbon cycle. 6. Biodiversity support: Many decomposers are themselves food for other organisms, supporting biodiversity at multiple trophic levels. 7. Disease prevention: By quickly breaking down dead organic matter, decomposers help prevent the spread of diseases that might otherwise proliferate in decaying materials. If decomposers were absent from an ecosystem, dead organisms and waste would accumulate, nutrients would become unavailable for new growth, soil quality would deteriorate, and the entire nutrient cycle would be disrupted. This would eventually lead to ecosystem collapse as plants would lack essential nutrients, affecting all other organisms in the food web. Therefore, decomposers, though often overlooked, are fundamental to maintaining environmental balance and ecosystem health.
Q34: How might human activities disrupt food webs? Give specific examples.
Answer: Human activities can disrupt food webs in numerous ways, often with far-reaching consequences for ecosystem balance: 1. Habitat destruction: When humans clear forests for agriculture, urban development, or resource extraction, they destroy the habitats that support many species. For example, deforestation in the Amazon rainforest eliminates habitat for countless species, breaking numerous links in complex food webs. 2. Overhunting and overfishing: Excessive hunting or fishing can deplete populations of key species. The overfishing of sharks, for instance, can lead to increases in their prey species (like rays), which in turn may overconsume shellfish, disrupting marine food webs. 3. Introduction of invasive species: Humans often introduce non-native species that can outcompete native ones or prey upon them without natural controls. For example, the introduction of cane toads in Australia has led to declines in native predators that try to eat these poisonous amphibians. 4. Pollution: Chemical pollutants can accumulate in organisms and become concentrated at higher trophic levels (biomagnification). DDT accumulation famously led to thinning eggshells in birds of prey, threatening top predators and disrupting food web balance. 5. Climate change: Human-induced climate change alters habitats and can create mismatches in timing between interdependent species. For instance, if insects emerge earlier due to warming temperatures, but birds haven't adjusted their migration timing, the birds may miss their food source. 6. Agricultural practices: Monoculture farming eliminates diverse plant communities that would support varied herbivores and their predators. Pesticide use can kill not only target pests but also beneficial insects that serve as food for many species. 7. Dams and water diversion: These can block fish migration routes, affecting aquatic food webs. The construction of dams on the Columbia River has severely impacted salmon populations, affecting both aquatic and terrestrial food webs that depend on these fish. 8. Selective removal of species: Targeting specific species, like wolves or other predators, can lead to trophic cascades. The removal of wolves from Yellowstone National Park led to elk population increases, overgrazing of vegetation, and subsequent effects on numerous other species until wolves were reintroduced. These disruptions demonstrate how human activities, even when targeting specific species or areas, can have ripple effects throughout food webs due to the interconnected nature of ecosystems. Understanding these connections is essential for developing conservation strategies that maintain environmental balance.
References
- Maharashtra State Board Environmental Studies (Part One) Standard Five Textbook (2015 Edition) - Chapter 4: Environmental Balance.
- Maharashtra State Board 5th Standard Environmental Studies Syllabus.
- Balbharati Environmental Studies Part 1 Textbook.